Content-moderation transparency suffers from a fundamental reliability problem: platforms disclose information about their practices, but the accuracy of those disclosures is difficult to verify. The Digital Services Act (DSA) introduced a Database of Statements of Reasons that has collected billions of decision-level records since February 2024, and, since July 2025, the Implementing Regulation has harmonised transparency-reporting templates and aligned categorisation across instruments. This article assesses whether those reforms convert the Database from an observation tool into a verification tool. The article argues that while the reforms deliver semantic alignment and comparability, they leave the legal relationship between aggregate reports (Articles 15, 24) and decision-level data (Article 17) undefined. A narrowly tailored duty of traceability – linking reported aggregates to the corresponding statements of reasons – would enable systematic consistency checks without expanding the scope of reporting. Absent this clarification, transparency will remain descriptive rather than verifiable, particularly for intermediaries outside the audit regime.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alessia Zornetta (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: