Empirical analysis reveals key architectural and normative flaws in the EU DSA Transparency Database across eight platforms, highlighting the need for higher data granularity.
The EU Digital Services Act ('DSA') leans heavily on transparency obligations in pursuit of a 'safe, predictable and trusted online environment' (Article 1(1)). The present paper critically assesses the product of one DSA transparency obligation in particular: the 'DSA Transparency Database' ('TDB'), to which online platforms must submit an explanation for most content moderation decisions they take. As Recital 66 elucidates, its multifaceted objective entails ensuring transparency and enabling scrutiny over platforms' content moderation decisions and tracking the spread of illegal content online. Through an empirical inquiry into eight leading platforms' submissions to the TDB, this paper maps the flaws that impede the TDB's effectiveness, stemming from both database architecture and the underlying normative framework. By extension, the paper explores whether Implementing Regulation 2024/2835, adopted to standardise transparency reporting under the DSA, improves the TDB's informativeness. The analysis concludes by stressing the importance of granularity, in leveraging data to insights.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eline Leijten (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: