Background/Objectives: This study examines whether rhythm-resolved EEG features separate two retrospective groups and whether those features can be traced to explicit rhythms and sensors. The groups are psychiatric-service adults with recorded violent offences and non-clinical controls; the design does not compare offenders with non-offenders. Methods: We analysed 2554 non-overlapping 15 s EEG epochs from 95 adults (51 controls; 44 recorded-offence participants). RhythmFluxPat generated 9216 rank-transition features. CWImRMR selected 352 features with full-cohort labels, and classifier selection was nested within 95 participant-held-out leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) folds. Results: Classifier-nested tkNN classified 2392/2554 epochs (93.66%) and 93/95 participants (97.89%), and an independent check reproduced both confusion matrices. A nested support-vector machine (SVM) gave similar values (94.71% of epochs; 93/95 participants). In the comparative evaluation of four feature selectors, CWImRMR remained the best branch (93.85%), and a 44-feature subset reached 91.11%. DRLobish linked the selected features to delta and beta-to-gamma routes in the recorded-offence-assigned panel and to theta and alpha-to-theta routes in the control-assigned panel. Conclusions: RhythmFluxPat provides traceable rank-persistence and rank-exchange coordinates. The reported accuracies are optimistic internal estimates. Fully nested replication with matched psychiatric controls is required before any claim of generalisation or biomarker validity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yıldırım et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: