Purpose This study examines delay response and employer risk-cost optimization in programs under the employer-furnished resource mode, where delays affect both schedule performance and resource supply. Design/methodology/approach An integrated decision framework is developed by combining Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS), Graph Neural Network–General Regression Neural Network (GNN-GRNN), and Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG). The framework is used to generate uncertain delay scenarios, identify inter-subproject relationships, predict resource demand, and optimize crashing and resource supply decisions in a coordinated manner. The framework is evaluated through a case study of a large engineering program, with the case data providing the baseline inputs for scenario generation and model evaluation. Findings The proposed method reduces average resource demand prediction error by 4.73% and lowers total employer risk cost by 15.0%, including reductions of 14.9% in schedule risk cost and 15.4% in resource risk cost. The results also show that, under the employer-furnished resource mode (EFR), some non-critical subprojects may have higher intervention priority and that critical path-oriented delay response does not necessarily minimize total loss. Originality/value This study extends delay response analysis from a schedule-focused perspective to a coupled schedule–resource risk-cost perspective. It shows that, under the employer-furnished resource mode, managerial attention should move beyond critical path control toward the identification and coordinated control of risk propagation paths.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: