This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Clinical translation of 3D-bioprinted stem cell constructs requires standardized characterization across length scales and biological domains. This review critically evaluates imaging and analytical methods along the construct lifecycle: bioink rheology and printability, structural imaging by micro-computed tomography and optical coherence tomography, cellular analysis by confocal, light-sheet, and multiphoton microscopy, chemical mapping by vibrational spectroscopy and mass spectrometry imaging, and bulk and nanoscale mechanical testing. Beyond cataloging techniques, we propose a decision-oriented framework that maps critical quality attributes to workflow stages, distinguishes essential from optional measurements, defines a nondestructive-to-destructive testing sequence, delineates the operational limits of each method in opaque, thick, and cell-dense constructs, and separates established tools from emerging approaches such as machine learning-based quality prediction and digital twins. Finally, we outline the remaining needs for reference materials, standardized protocols, and recently updated regulatory pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: