Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: A family history of breast cancer may impact reproductive choices and decisions about family-building. This study evaluated family-building considerations, plans, and decisional processes among women with a breast cancer family history, and examined sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors related to decision uncertainty. Methods: Cross-sectional data from the Breast Cancer Family Registry (BCFR) Young Women’s Study were analyzed. Participants were women (18-45 years old) with a breast cancer family history. They completed questionnaires including a Reproductive Choices module. Bivariate analyses and multiple regression evaluated relationships among study variables. Results: Participants (N=471) were on average 30.3 years old (SD=6.7), predominantly non-Hispanic White (75.1%), and over half were childless (58.6%); nearly half (47.8%) desired future children, 16.6% were unsure, and 35.7% did not. Among those interested/unsure (n=303), most considered natural conception (85.8%); many were unsure about alternative options such as embryo genetic testing, donor gametes, surrogacy, and adoption. Between 43–57% endorsed some degree of decision uncertainty. Perceived knowledge about genetic cancer risk and family-building options appeared low overall. In the final model, greater decision uncertainty was associated with having no history of pregnancy, identifying as Ashkenazi Jewish, endorsing concern about a future child's health, lack of concern about family-building timeline, and lower perceived knowledge about genetic cancer risk and family-building options. Conclusions: Among women with a familial risk for breast cancer, decision uncertainty about family-building options is prevalent and is driven by health-related concerns, knowledge gaps, financial barriers, and values-based considerations. Findings can inform targeted decision support interventions for this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: