Background: Agricultural work represents a vocation with elevated risks shaped by factors such as financial volatility, environmental unpredictability, and professional pressures that negatively affect psychological health. Methods and Materials: An explanatory mixed-methods study was carried out. The quantitative phase involved a cross-sectional survey of 214 randomly selected farmers using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and Presumptive Stressful Life Events Scale (PSLES). The qualitative phase incorporated 15 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with farmers and key stakeholders to contextualize findings. Statistical Analysis: Data were analyzed using Jamovi (version 2.2.5). Descriptive and inferential statistics (Chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, t -test, and Spearman’s rank correlation) were applied. Multivariable binary logistic regression models were built ( N = 214) to identify independent psychological determinants, with P < 0.05 considered significant. Thematic analysis was used for qualitative data. Results: Moderate stress was reported by 50.9% (95% CI: 44.2–57.6%, n = 109), high stress by 18.3% (95% CI: 13.6–24.1%, n = 39), and low stress by 30.8% of the participants. Mild depressive symptoms were seen in 4% (95% CI: 2.1–7.4%, n = 9) of participants. In multivariable regression, a joint family structure emerged as a significant independent protective factor against moderate-to-high perceived stress (aOR = 0.306;95% CI: 0.122–0.769; P = 0.012). Key stressors included crop loss (60.7%), financial problems (43.5%), and large loans (29.4%). A positive correlation was found between stressful life events and depressive symptoms (ρ = 0.263, P < 0.001). Conclusions: While the incidence of clinical depression was low, the high perceived stress and regular exposure to detrimental life events indicate concealed psychological distress among farmers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yedage et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: