People sometimes attempt to avoid blame with the following excuse: “I didn’t know I was doing anything wrong; I was just doing my job.” I argue that this excuse points towards a distinctive form of genuinely exculpatory ignorance. Complying with social role norms involves following deliberative norms that can explain agents’ claims of ignorance and mitigate their blameworthiness. My account of this experience makes a surprising contribution to the debate over when ignorance excuses. If we accept that nonculpable moral ignorance excuses, my argument highlights a novel form of ignorance that can be experienced by role occupants. On some views, however, what matters is being motivated by the right reasons (having a “good will”), so even nonculpably morally ignorant agents are blameworthy because they are not appropriately responsive to moral considerations. My account challenges the accepted view that having a good will just is responsiveness to moral reasons. I offer role occupants as a case study of moral ignorance with a good will. The fact that our social roles can lead to exculpatory ignorance in this ordinary and pervasive way opens up new territory for theories of moral responsibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eliza Wells (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: