Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
What interest rate is implied when monetary, inflation, and employment signals diverge? This paper introduces the Monetary-Absorption Rule with a Common-Inflation Floor and Employment Safeguard (MAR-IFS), a sequential alternative to additive policy rules. Applying current-vintage data, all nine specifications signal normalization by 2021Q4. Same-input additive and Taylor benchmarks confirm this broad timing but trace different paths. When signals align, addition compounds them, producing 8.3% versus 6.7% under MAR-IFS. When signals conflict, addition allows offsetting, producing 3.5% versus 4.0%. The max operator blocks offsetting when signals conflict and blocks mechanical accumulation when they align, while revealing which signal binds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masaaki Yoshimori (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: