Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Derivatives of 2'-deoxyuridine and of the anticancer agent 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdUR) were linked indirectly via a human serum albumin carrier (HSA) to the murine antiosteosarcoma monoclonal antibody 791T/36. Starting from the 2'-deoxyuridines 1a and 1b, the new nucleosides containing 5'-succinamic acid 7 and 5'-maleamic acid 8 spacers were synthesized from the key intermediate 5'-aminonucleoside 4, and the ribofuronamidobenzoic acid 13 from ribofuranuronic acid 10. These nucleosides were linked via their spacer functionality to HSA. High molar substitution ratios (MSR: moles of drug/mole of HSA) of 25-40 for these derivative-HSA conjugates were achieved. All derivatives were less cytotoxic than the parent drug against both antigen positive osteogenic sarcoma 791T and antigen negative bladder carcinoma T24 cell lines; no IC50 was achieved with any derivative against 791T cells. The fluorodeoxyuridine-HSA conjugates were then further linked via a stable thioether bond to the mouse monoclonal antibody 791T/36. The optimum fluorinated 5'-succinamic acid immunoconjugate exhibited an IC50 of 1 microM against 791T and T24 cells, slightly better than that of fluorodeoxyuridine. The unconjugated derivative 7 was much less cytotoxic than immunoconjugate, with an IC50 of 62 microM on T24 cells, and failed to reach 50% inhibition of 791T cell growth at 290 microM concentration. Derivative 7-HSA conjugate was 10-fold less cytotoxic than the immunoconjugate against both cell lines. Immunoconjugates synthesized with the other 5-fluoro derivatives were unable to effect 50% inhibition of growth of cell lines. Nonfluorinated derivatives and their HSA conjugates and immunoconjugates exhibited no cytotoxicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tfg et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: