Key result
SGLT2 inhibitors evaluated against DPP-4 inhibitors for MACE in patients starting tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Why the study?
Does initiation of a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) compared to a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in adults starting tyrosine kinase inhibitors?
Cohort
Yes
Does initiation of a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) compared to a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in adults starting tyrosine kinase inhibitors?
This study protocol outlines a target trial emulation to evaluate whether SGLT2 inhibitors reduce major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality compared to DPP-4 inhibitors in patients initiating tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Emulation protocol compares SGLT2i vs DPP-4i on MACE in TKI users; leaves open CV effects in this population.
This document is the protocol of a target trial emulation comparing initiation of a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) with initiation of a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) among adults starting one of 15 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-targeting, BCR-ABL, or BTK inhibitors) in the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network. The primary endpoint is major adverse cardiovascular events and the key secondary endpoint is all-cause mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hsu et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Patients starting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-targeting, BCR-ABL, or BTK inhibitors). Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) initiation vs. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) initiation was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events. SGLT2 inhibitors versus DPP-4 inhibitors are being evaluated for major adverse cardiovascular events in adults starting tyrosine kinase inhibitors in this target trial emulation protocol.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: