Key result
Tirofiban use in acute ischemic stroke is linked to ~57% lower discharge disability.
Why the study?
Tirofiban, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, has been investigated for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but its association with early discharge functional outcomes remained uncertain.
Does tirofiban improve discharge functional outcomes (mRS and NIHSS scores) in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Cohort (n=344)
Does tirofiban improve discharge functional outcomes (mRS and NIHSS scores) in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
In this retrospective cohort study of acute ischemic stroke patients, tirofiban use was associated with improved early functional outcomes at hospital discharge as measured by the modified Rankin Scale, though no difference was seen in discharge NIHSS scores.
Should not change practice in acute ischemic stroke; leaves open efficacy pending randomized confirmation.
Objectives Tirofiban, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist, has been investigated for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), but its association with early discharge functional outcomes remains uncertain. This study evaluated the association between tirofiban use and discharge outcomes in AIS patients.Methods We enrolled 344 consecutive AIS patients, including 191 who received tirofiban and 153 who did not. Missing data were handled using multiple imputation. Analyses included propensity score matching, multivariable linear regression with HC3 robust standard errors, ordinal logistic regression, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, restricted cubic spline analysis, and E-value analysis. Primary outcomes were discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores.Results After adjusting for nine relevant covariates, tirofiban use was associated with significantly lower discharge mRS scores (β = -0.352, 95% CI −0.625 to −0.079, p = 0.011). This remained robust under HC3 robust standard errors (p = 0.020), ordinal logistic regression (OR = 0.434, 95% CI 0.267–0.706, p < 0.001), and propensity score matching (mean difference = -0.456, 95% CI −0.879 to −0.033, p = 0.035). The association was consistent across age, sex, and admission NIHSS subgroups, with an E-value of 2.40. No significant association was observed between tirofiban use and discharge NIHSS scores.Discussion These findings suggest tirofiban use is associated with better early functional outcomes in AIS patients, as reflected by lower discharge mRS scores. The robustness across multiple analytical approaches strengthens the validity of these observations. Further prospective multicenter randomized controlled trials are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) (n=344). Tirofiban vs. No tirofiban was evaluated on Discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (OR 0.434, 95% CI 0.267-0.706, p=<0.001). Tirofiban use in acute ischemic stroke was associated with lower discharge mRS scores (β = -0.352, 95% CI -0.625 to -0.079; ordinal OR 0.434, p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: