Key result
Tirofiban monotherapy was noninferior to dual antiplatelet therapy regarding 90-day functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (adjusted common OR 0.97).
Why the study?
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists such as tirofiban are beneficial in acute coronary syndromes, but their efficacy and safety in patients with acute ischemic stroke remain uncertain.
Does tirofiban monotherapy improve functional outcomes or reduce mortality and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute ischemic stroke compared to dual antiplatelet therapy?
Cohort (n=255)
Yes
Does tirofiban monotherapy improve functional outcomes or reduce mortality and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with acute ischemic stroke compared to dual antiplatelet therapy?
Odds Ratio: 0.97 (95% CI 0.46–2.04)
p-value: p=0.93
In patients with acute ischemic stroke, early intravenous tirofiban monotherapy appears safe but does not significantly improve 90-day functional outcomes compared to standard dual antiplatelet therapy.
Tirofiban monotherapy appears safe but offers no functional benefit over dual antiplatelet therapy in AIS; leaves open superiority in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists such as tirofiban are beneficial for patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, it is still uncertain about the efficacy and safety of tirofiban in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). METHODS: In this prospective non-randomized study, 255 AIS patients were recruited from 4 comprehensive stroke centers in China between January, 2017 and May, 2018. Among them,169 patients were treated with aspirin plus clopidogrel and 86 patients were treated with tirofiban. The primary functional outcome was the distribution of the 90 days' modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The safety outcomes included the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) at discharge and mortality at 3 months. RESULTS: In the propensity score matched cohort, tirofiban alone was noninferior to the dual antiplatelet with regard to the primary outcome (adjusted common odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 2.04; P = 0.93). Mortality at 90 days was 10% in the dual antiplatelet group and 8% in the tirofiban group (adjusted odds ratio 0.75; 95% CI 0.08 to 7.40, p = 0.81). There was no difference of the ICH rate between two groups (adjusted odds ratio 0.44; 95% CI 0.13 to 1.48, p = 0.18). In the inverse probability of treatment weighting-propensity score-adjusted cohort, similar differences were found for functional and safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that tirofiban use appears to be safe as monotherapy in AIS treatment compared with common dual antiplatelet therapy, however, no improvement in functional outcomes was found. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese clinical trial registry, ChiCTR2000034443 , 05/07/2020. Retrospectively registered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke (n=255). Tirofiban vs. Aspirin plus clopidogrel was evaluated on Distribution of the 90 days' modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.46-2.04, p=0.93). Tirofiban monotherapy was noninferior to dual antiplatelet therapy regarding 90-day functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (adjusted common OR 0.97).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: