Why the study?
The safety and effect of intra-arterial tirofiban during stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy for large artery occlusion required investigation.
Does intra-arterial tirofiban during mechanical thrombectomy improve efficacy and safety in patients with large artery occlusion?
Does intra-arterial tirofiban during mechanical thrombectomy improve efficacy and safety in patients with large artery occlusion?
Intra-arterial tirofiban during mechanical thrombectomy for large artery occlusion appears safe and may improve procedural efficacy by reducing stent passes and re-occlusion rates.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support adjunctive tirofiban in thrombectomy; leaves open randomized confirmation of efficacy and safety.
OBJECTIVE: The safety and effect of intra-arterial (IA) tirofiban, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, during the stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy (MT) was investigated. METHODS: From January 2015 to May 2019, a total of 327 patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy of large artery occlusions (LAO). Patients were classified into two groups: MT with IA tirofiban (MTT) group and MT only (MTO, without IA tirofiban) group. Clinical outcomes, radiological results, and various complications, such as post thrombectomy hemorrhage, symptomatic hemorrhage, other systemic bleeding, and hemorrhagic transformation of infarct were evaluated by comparing the MTT group and MTO group. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed for patients who underwent MT with prior intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). RESULTS: The MTT group needed a lower mean number of stent passes and showed a re-occlusion rate as compared with the MTO group (P=0.038 and 0.022, respectively). Between the two groups, there were no statistically significant differences in post thrombectomy hemorrhage, symptomatic hemorrhage, other systemic bleeding complications, or hemorrhagic transformation of infarct (P = 0.511, 0.397, 0.429, and 0.355, respectively). In the subgroup analysis, similar findings were observed. CONCLUSION: The use of IA tirofiban during MT seems to be safe and potentially more effective than only MT without IA tirofiban, even in patients who used IV t-PA before MT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: