The structural response of extrusion-based concrete members may retain a measurable imprint of the manufacturing process, yet this process history is rarely incorporated explicitly into structural assessment. This study develops a process-informed numerical framework that links fresh-state deposition history to the hardened flexural behaviour of a 3D-printed concrete beam. Sequential layer activation with age-dependent fresh-state properties is first used to reproduce the as-printed configuration, which is subsequently transferred to a hardened four-point-bending model incorporating time-dependent interlayer degradation. The effects of fresh-state deformation, printing speed, interlayer delay, interface position and concrete strength are examined. A complementary mechanics-based model is also introduced to assess whether the residual interlayer shear-transfer capacity is sufficient to maintain composite action. The numerical results show that interlayer degradation can cause a transition from predominantly flexural behaviour to coupled cracking–debonding and ultimately to non-composite action. The analytical model reproduces this transition by identifying a threshold at which the available interface force becomes insufficient to sustain the longitudinal force required for composite behaviour. The proposed process-to-structure framework and the mechanics-based capacity–demand interpretation constitute the principal conceptual outcomes of the study. The specific peak loads, bond-retention levels and critical delay reported herein are particular to the investigated geometry, material properties, interface formulation and adopted empirical time-gap relationship, including its extrapolation beyond the original calibration range for some cases. The results therefore support process-informed structural assessment in which manufacturing history is treated as an explicit contributor to the mechanical state of printed concrete members.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rohola Rahnavard (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: