Exploring social work epistemology, this article traces the epistemological evolution of Social Service Review (SSR) publications from 1927 to the present. We identify three broad epistemic eras in the social sciences and then group articles accordingly: positivism (1920s–present); socially situated, constructed epistemologies (1960–present); and critical epistemologies of liberation and repair (1990s–present). Our findings demonstrate that SSR articles have never endorsed a single epistemology but straddle the line between professional and disciplinary responsibilities. Rather than pit epistemic traditions as rivals, this moment calls for stitching across them—weaving measurement into conversation with meaning, critique with evidence, and empirical inquiry with justice and repair.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samuels et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: