Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: The South African Pharmacy Council (SAPC) pre-registration examination is a key competency assessment for pharmacist interns seeking professional registration. Over the past decade, the examination method has evolved from paper-based to online at designated venues and then to remote online formats. Aim: To analyse pharmacist interns’ performance across three examination methods conducted by the SAPC between 2015 and 2022. Methods: An observational, longitudinal study analysed retrospective examination results of 4 843 pharmacist interns who attempted 5 437 pre-registration examinations, which are grouped into three periods: Period A (2015–2016, paper-based), Period B (2017–2019, online at designated venues), and Period C (2020–2022, remote online). Performance included pass rate and number of examination attempts across Paper 1 (pharmaceutical calculations) and Paper 2 (general and sector-specific knowledge). Results: The number of pharmacist interns who passed the first time showed a statistically significant increase when the format changed from paper-based to remote online examinations (p < .0001; Cramér’s V = 0.1314). Median marks of Paper 1 increased from 70.0% (IQR 62.0%–80.0%) to 77.5% (IQR 68.0%–83.0%), those of Paper 2 from 56.0% (IQR 46.0%–62.0%) to 70.0% (IQR 64.0%–75.0%), with overall pass rates increased from 59.0% in paper-based to 91.9% in remote online exams (p < .0001; Cramér’s V = 0.3805). Performance varied by university of graduation and pharmacy sector, while gender exerted minimal influence. Conclusion: The results revealed a significant improvement in performance across examination methods, with the highest first-attempt pass rates during remote online examinations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maloka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: