Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Practical precepts for organizing and explaining mathematical papers prepared with artificial intelligence. The guide addresses contribution and proof strategy, proportionate detail, notation, accurate descriptions of formal and computational support, source checking, and six questions about readability and disclosure. It distinguishes readability assessment from correctness verification and complements the AIM-R public-release protocol without replacing its requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert Barritz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: