The article proposes a new mechanism of superluminal communication based on the "universes here" model. Key clarification: a distinction is introduced between the ontological selector S (the equilibrium parameter of a universe) and the epistemic choice G (the observer's choice, scale). This resolves the contradiction between the epistemic status of G and the physical mechanism of switching. It is shown that the universe U(S) is a system with stable parameters of space-time that activates certain categories of elements of reality from the complete set Ω. The metaphor of "puddles after rain" illustrates: the activation of elements of reality is natural selection under equilibrium, not the choice of an observer. The topology of space T(S) is considered as a function of S. At different S space has a different topological structure. The key concept is the "fold": a topological defect connecting distant points and making them "neighboring" in another S. Superluminal communication is accomplished not by creating a fold, but by using an already existing one. The transmitter does not create an interface — it finds an existing topological path. This removes the question of the energy of switching. The signal formula: signal_out = T(S')(signal_in), where T is a topological transformation (an isomorphism), not a projection. A comparison is conducted with existing models: Morris–Thorne wormholes, extra dimensions (IDMM), the CMB frame, Everett's MWI, Tegmark's Multiverse, MIW of Hall, Wiseman, and Deckert. The model is unique: it requires neither extra dimensions, nor exotic matter, nor a preferred frame, nor branching, nor interaction between worlds, nor the creation of a new topology. The question of the model's compatibility with causality is left open. Possible areas of search are discussed: anomalies in the cosmic microwave background, vacuum fluctuations, H0 tension, anomalies in the distribution of galaxies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexander Yourievitch Kotelnikov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: