Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Contemporary accounts of affect emphasize different perspectives, ranging from the regulation of bodily states in allostatic approaches to the relational and sense-making character stressed by enactive theories. Here, we show that affect can be made explicit within the sense-making phase transition framework previously introduced for the perception of an inner sensation. Within this same formal structure, each stable minimum of the sense-making potential defines an affective state: its position determines valence, while its depth determines arousal. Affect therefore is not introduced as an independent ingredient, but emerges as the associated state in the valence-arousal space, providing a link between allostatic and enactive approaches to affect. This formulation distinguishes valence intensity from arousal, allows for dominant and secondary affective states, and naturally accommodates mixed-valence configurations beyond a strictly bipolar description. Revisiting representative landscapes of the model, we show how neutral, uncertain, polarized, and mixed-valence regimes arise as a function of contextual sensory information, learned historical evaluation, and externally supplied information. We further show that the resulting valence-arousal relation provides a theoretical basis for the upper-open V-shaped organization discussed in the affect literature, while also opening a natural route toward a dynamical description of affect and emotions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bosch et al. (2026) studied this question.