Key result
Lower fetal atrial distensibility predicts adverse outcomes in single-ventricle congenital heart disease with AV valve regurgitation.
Why the study?
Whether assessing atrial distensibility helps predict perinatal outcomes in fetuses prenatally diagnosed with single ventricle-type congenital heart disease and atrioventricular valve regurgitation was unknown.
Does quantitative echocardiographic assessment of atrial distensibility predict composite perinatal adverse events (fetal demise, neonatal death, or early valvuloplasty within 2 months of birth) in fetuses with single ventricle-type congenital heart disease and significant atrioventricular valve regurgitation?
Cohort (n=60)
Single operator blinded to clinical data for atrial area tracings
No
Does quantitative echocardiographic assessment of atrial distensibility predict composite perinatal adverse events (fetal demise, neonatal death, or early valvuloplasty within 2 months of birth) in fetuses with single ventricle-type congenital heart disease and significant atrioventricular valve regurgitation?
Quantitative fetal echocardiographic assessment of atrial distensibility is impaired in fetuses with single ventricle-type congenital heart disease and significant atrioventricular valve regurgitation, and strongly predicts short-term adverse perinatal outcomes including fetal demise, neonatal death, and early infantile valvuloplasty.
Atrial distensibility may support perinatal risk stratification in SVCHD with moderate AVVR; leaves open need for prospective validation before adoption.
We aimed to determine whether the assessment of atrial distensibility helps predict perinatal outcomes in fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of single ventricle-type congenital heart disease (SVCHD) with atrioventricular valve regurgitation (AVVR). We retrospectively identified 77 consecutive cases of fetuses with SVCHD examined between 2011 and 2023. Atrial distensibility and conventional echocardiographic parameters used to assess the severity of fetal heart failure were measured retrospectively. Fetuses with SVCHD were divided into two groups according to AVVR severity: no-mild or ≥moderate. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of composite adverse events (fetal demise, neonatal death of any cause, and early infantile valvuloplasty). The impact of atrial distensibility on prognosis was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Overall, 77 fetuses were diagnosed prenatally with SVCHD; 9 were terminated, and 8 were excluded due to chromosomal abnormalities. Of the 60 fetuses with SVCHD, 48 and 12 had no-mild and ≥moderate AVVR, respectively. Atrial distensibility was significantly lower in fetuses with SVCHD and ≥moderate AVVR than in those with no-mild AVVR (p < 0.001). Among fetuses with SVCHD and ≥moderate AVVR, atrial distensibility was impaired in fetuses with adverse events compared to those without adverse events (p < 0.05). ROC analysis indicated that atrial distensibility exhibited a significant predictive value for composite adverse outcomes in fetal SVCHD with ≥moderate AVVR (area under the curve 0.90; p = 0.02). Quantitative assessment of atrial distensibility may have clinical utility in predicting the perinatal outcomes of fetal SVCHD with significant AVVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akazawa et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Fetal single ventricle-type congenital heart disease (SVCHD) with atrioventricular valve regurgitation (AVVR) (n=60). Impaired atrial distensibility on fetal echocardiography vs. Normal or preserved atrial distensibility / No-mild AVVR vs >=moderate AVVR was evaluated on Composite adverse events (fetal demise, neonatal death of any cause, and surgery/early infantile valvuloplasty for AVVR due to heart failure within 2 months of birth) in fetuses with SVCHD and >=moderate AVVR (AUC 0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.0, p=0.02). Atrial distensibility was lower in SVCHD fetuses with >=moderate AVVR having adverse events (0.19 vs 0.40, p=0.02) and predicted composite adverse outcomes (AUC 0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.0).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: