Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Technical vocabulary is central to academic participation in English for Specific Purposes contexts, yet evidence remains limited concerning how mobile-assisted flashcard systems support distinct dimensions of discipline-specific vocabulary development. This mixed-methods study examined psychology-related technical vocabulary learning and retention among 80 Uzbek undergraduates in a quasi-experimental intact-class design. Two classes used digital flashcards through Anki on smartphones (n = 50), whereas one class used paper-based flashcards containing the same 100 target terms (n = 30) during a ten-week intervention. Vocabulary development was assessed at pre-test, post-test, and delayed post-test through depth of vocabulary knowledge, meaning recognition, and productive vocabulary use. Baseline-adjusted multivariate analyses showed stronger post-test and delayed post-test vocabulary profiles in the digital-flashcard group. Gain-retention analyses indicated larger immediate and retained gains across the three outcomes. Post-to-delayed change also differed between conditions, specifically because productive vocabulary continued to increase in the digital condition but declined slightly in the paper condition. A Bayesian mixed-effects comparison of Vocabulary Knowledge Scale trajectories decisively favored the Group × Time model. Interviews with 15 digital-flashcard users, analyzed through cultural-historical activity theory, indicated that digital flashcards mediated planning, monitoring, and motivation while creating tensions involving distraction and workload. Mobile-assisted flashcards therefore supported technical vocabulary learning through the interaction of spaced review, self-regulated engagement, and delayed productive consolidation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feizarbabi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: