Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study aims to examine the effect of Transformational Leadership Style and the Physical Work Environment on Employee Performance at the Cisauk District Office, Tangerang Regency, both partially and simultaneously. This study employed a quantitative method with a sample of 57 respondents selected using a saturated sampling technique. The results indicate that, partially, Transformational Leadership Style has a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance, with a calculated t-value of 12.296 > the t-table value of 2.005 and a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05. The Physical Work Environment also has a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance, with a calculated t-value of 11.335 > the t-table value of 2.005. Simultaneously, Transformational Leadership Style and the Physical Work Environment have a positive and significant effect on Employee Performance, with a calculated F-value of 84.748 > the F-table value of 3.17 and a significance value of 0.000 < 0.05. The Adjusted R Square value of 0.773 indicates that 77.3% of the variation in Employee Performance can be explained by Transformational Leadership Style and the Physical Work Environment, while the remaining 22.7% is influenced by other factors outside the scope of this study. Therefore, better implementation of transformational leadership and a more supportive physical work environment are associated with higher employee performance at the Cisauk District Office, Tangerang Regency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adiguno et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: