Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose Thoracic trauma can cause life-threatening respiratory and hemodynamic compromise. We examined associations between prehospital physiological parameters and acute thoracic intervention in patients with thoracic trauma. Methods This retrospective TraumaRegister DGU® cohort study was conducted at a level I trauma centre (2018–2022). Adults with thoracic trauma were included; patients undergoing prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation were excluded. Thoracic intervention comprised prehospital decompression and/or emergency department chest tube placement. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed. Results Among 387 patients, 104 (26.9%) underwent intervention. In the primary model (n = 317), lower oxygen saturation (SpO₂) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] per percentage-point increase, 0.949; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.913–0.986) and penetrating trauma (adjusted OR, 9.163; 95% CI, 2.735–30.699) were associated with intervention. In the exploratory alternative model (n = 277), higher respiratory rate was also associated with intervention (adjusted OR per breath/min, 1.071; 95% CI, 1.010–1.135); associations with SpO₂ and penetrating trauma persisted. SpO₂ discrimination was limited (area under the curve, 0.610; 95% CI, 0.540–0.680). Conclusion Lower SpO₂ and penetrating trauma were associated with thoracic intervention in the primary model; higher respiratory rate was additionally associated in the exploratory alternative model. Because SpO₂ had limited discriminatory ability, it should not be used alone to guide decisions about thoracic intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reccius et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: