Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Surface-capture immunoassays and biosensors in microchannels are usually analysed as if the sample never runs out. A diagnostic sample does: a few microlitres must be processed within a fixed assay time, and the detection limit is set by how many analyte molecules reach the capture surface. I modelled a capture patch on the floor of a rectangular channel through which a finite sample is pumped, using a steady marching solver and an independent two-dimensional transient solver with Langmuir kinetics. Both were validated against the Lévêque, Graetz and reaction-limited solutions and against each other to within 0.5%. The flow rate that maximises capture is the one that delivers the whole sample in exactly the available time, Q* = V/T, and transient simulations confirmed this in every case tested, including near saturation. At that flow rate the captured fraction depends on only two dimensionless groups and is bounded by a transport ceiling and a kinetic ceiling. The kinetic group contains neither channel height nor diffusivity. A closed-form combination of the two ceilings reproduces the numerical solution to within − 2.2% to + 1.4% over the whole design space. Recirculation helps only up to the kinetic ceiling. For a nominal point-of-care design, pumping ten times faster than Q* cut the captured fraction from 8.5% to 1.2% and raised the detection limit from 3.9 fM to 27.6 fM. Simple design rules follow, and the code is provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ananya Sharma (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: