The Influence of the Physical Work Environment and Workload on Work Productivity with Job Satisfaction as a Moderating Variable at UD. Dimas Sintiya Lubuklinggau

This study aims to analyze the influence of the Physical Work Environment and Workload on Work Productivity with Job Satisfaction as a moderating variable at UD. Dimas Sintiya Lubuklinggau. This research method uses a quantitative research design. The population in this study is all employees at UD Dimas Sintiya with a saturated sampling technique of 31 respondents. The results of the t-test on the physical work environment on work productivity show a calculated t value of 2.916, which is greater than the t-table value of 2.042, with a significance level of 0.007 < (α) 0.05. Therefore, Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. Partially, the physical work environment variable has a significant influence on work productivity. The results of the workload t-test on work productivity show that the t-value = 4.190 is greater than the t-table value of 2.042 with a significant level = 0.000 < (α) 0.05, so Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted and partially the workload variable has a significant influence on work productivity. The results of the F-test obtained 12.196> F-table = 3.32 and the level of significance simultaneously is 0.000 < (α) = 0.05. With an F-table value of 3.32 so that Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, the R-square value is 0.260, meaning that the contribution of the influence of the physical work environment variable on work productivity after the moderating variable of job satisfaction is 26.0%. The R-square value is 0.393, meaning that the contribution of the influence of the workload variable on work productivity after the moderating variable of job satisfaction is 39.3%. The R-squared value is 0.489, indicating that the physical work environment contributes 48.9% to work productivity after the moderating variable of job satisfaction.