Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background : The World Health Organization recommends episiotomy rates of about 10–15%. However, studies in Uganda have reported higher episiotomy rates than the WHO-recommended rate. Higher episiotomy rates may suggest overmedicalization of childbirth. The study was conducted to determine the prevalence and factors associated with episiotomy in our setting. Methods : A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in Eastern Uganda. We recruited 370 women who had uncomplicated vaginal birth. Participants were recruited during discharge from the postnatal unit of the hospital. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used for data collection. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess factors associated with episiotomy. Results : Nearly a third (29.7%, n = 110/370) of women sustained perineal tears during childbirth. The prevalence of episiotomy was 11.6% (43/370). The factors associated with the practice of episiotomy were the birth attendant being a doctor (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 4.28; 95% CI: 1.36–13.44), multiparity (AOR = 0.01; 95% CI: 0.03–0.34), increasing fetal head circumference (AOR = 1.51; 95% CI: 1.04–2.20), having perineal tears (AOR = 0.16; 95% CI: 0.06–0.48), and labor augmentation (AOR = 2.92; 95% CI: 1.14–7.48). Conclusion : Episiotomy rates were within the WHO-recommended range. Episiotomy was associated with parity, type of birth attendant, fetal head circumference, perineal tears, and use of labor augmentation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taaka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: