Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Quantitative OCT angiography (OCTA) requires well-defined measurement error for longitudinal interpretation, particularly in high myopia. We evaluated intrasession repeatability of automated 6×6 mm swept-source OCTA macular vessel-density measurements in highly myopic eyes. Methods Repeated lens-off macular scans were obtained with the DRI OCT Triton 3D Plus using OCTARA. Thirteen participants contributed 23 anatomical eyes and 32 paired comparisons. Superficial and deep capillary plexus (SCP/DCP) vessel density was analyzed centrally and in four parafoveal sectors. Repeatability was assessed with two-way random-effects, single-measure, absolute-agreement ICC [ICC(A,1)], within-subject SD (Sw), coefficient of variation (CV), repeatability coefficient (RC), Bland-Altman limits of agreement, participant-cluster bootstrap confidence intervals, and a one-pair-per-eye sensitivity analysis. Results Central reliability was excellent (SCP ICC 0.926, 95% CI 0.643–0.957; DCP ICC 0.934, 0.832–0.961). Sectoral ICCs were lower (0.399–0.691), whereas sectoral CVs remained 2.24%–3.35% and RCs 3.08–4.89 percentage points. Absolute mean bias was ≤ 0.57 percentage points in all regions. Sensitivity analysis preserved excellent central reliability. Eight lens-on pairs were analyzed only exploratorily. Conclusions Central 6×6 mm Triton OCTA vessel-density measurements were highly repeatable in high myopia, but parafoveal ICCs were more heterogeneous despite modest absolute error. Region-specific repeatability and standardized acquisition conditions should be considered when interpreting small longitudinal changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erol et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: