Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study aims to analyze the disharmonization of social security arrangements and termination of employment for crew members in the Indonesian legal system and formulate an integrative legal harmonization model. The method used is normative legal research with a legislative, conceptual, and comparative approach to the legal regime of employment, shipping, and social security. The results of the study show that regulatory fragmentation causes overlapping norms and regulatory gaps, especially related to the status of Maritime Labor Agreements, the sustainability of social security participation, and the protection mechanism after termination of employment. In practice, this condition has an impact on legal uncertainty, the disconnection of social protection, and the weak fulfillment of the normative rights of shipwrights. The study also found a disconnect between termination of employment and the social security system that magnifies the vulnerability of maritime sector workers. As a solution, this study offers a model of legal harmonization based on cross-regime integration through regulatory synchronization, strengthening institutional coordination, and integration of the Maritime Labor Agreement with the social security system. This model is expected to be able to realize sustainable and fair legal protection. The contribution of this research lies in the development of an integrative approach in maritime employment law and the provision of policy recommendations to improve legal certainty and social protection for shipowners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: