Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Integrating face-to-face and online learning in higher education requires coherent instructional design and appropriate digital support. This study evaluated the feasibility, practicality, and effectiveness of a Moodle-assisted blended learning model in the Information Systems Study Program. A research and development (R&D) approach was employed, with data collected through expert validation, student responses, classroom activity observations, and pretest and posttest assessments. Evaluation scores were 90% for learning materials, 91% for media presentation, 90% for practicality, 88% for pedagogical aspects, 93% for instructional devices, and 89% for the user guidebook. Individual, small-group, and field trials yielded scores of 84.76%, 89%, and approximately 96%, respectively. The student learning activity assessment yielded 87%. Mean test scores increased from 31.53 before implementation to 45.93 afterward, out of a maximum of 54. These descriptive findings support the model’s feasibility and practicality, while the observed score increase provides preliminary evidence of potential learning benefits. The study contributes a technology-supported instructional model for systematically integrating face-to-face and online activities in higher education, with practical implications for lecturers and institutions implementing blended learning. Further evaluation involving a control group and inferential statistical analysis is recommended to establish the model’s effectiveness more rigorously.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: