Key result
Six-month DAPT shows no difference in 10-year mortality compared to 12-month DAPT post-PCI.
Why the study?
Women are underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical trials and evidence regarding sex-specific long-term outcomes and DAPT duration after PCI with DES remains limited.
Does patient sex or a 6-month versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy duration affect 10-year all-cause mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents?
RCT (n=1,871)
Double-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does patient sex or a 6-month versus 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy duration affect 10-year all-cause mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents?
In patients undergoing PCI with DES, neither patient sex nor DAPT duration (6 vs. 12 months) was independently associated with 10-year all-cause mortality.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No difference in 10-year mortality with 6- versus 12-month DAPT; leaves open optimal duration and requires confirmation in larger trials.
Background Women are underrepresented in cardiovascular clinical trials and evidence regarding sex-specific long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains limited. Objectives To investigate the association between patient sex and duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with the 10-year prognosis of patients enrolled in the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ISAR-SAFE trial. Methods This post-hoc analysis included 1871 patients from centers that participated in the ISAR-SAFE trial and agreed to collect 10-year follow-up data. In the ISAR-SAFE trial, a 6-month DAPT duration was compared with a 12-month DAPT regimen in patients treated with drug-eluting stents (DES). The primary endpoint of the present study was all-cause death at 10 years. Results Compared to men, women were older (69.0 ± 9.7 vs. 64.8 ± 10.4 years, P < 0.001), had lower body weight (72.1 ± 14.2 vs. 84.8 ± 13.5 Kg, P < 0.001) and a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (93.2% vs. 89.3%, P = 0.031) and dyslipidemia (85.1% vs. 77.9%, P = 0.003). The 10-year mortality was 11.9% in women and 9.3% in men (hazard ratio [HR] 1.28 [95% confidence interval 0.91–1.81], P = 0.156). The 10-year mortality was 10.1% in the 6-month DAPT arm and 9.6% in the 12-month DAPT arm (HR 1.06 [0.79–1.42], P = 0.685). There was no significant interaction between sex and DAPT duration with respect to mortality. Age was the only independent predictor of mortality (adjusted HR per 1 year increase 1.08 [1.06–1.09]; P < 0.001). Conclusions Among patients undergoing PCI with DES implantation, neither patient sex nor duration of DAPT regimen were independently associated with 10-year all-cause mortality after adjustment for relevant clinical covariates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Molaro et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (n=1,871). 6-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and female sex vs. 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and male sex was evaluated on All-cause death at 10 years (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.79-1.42, p=0.685). Neither 6-month vs 12-month DAPT (10.1% vs 9.6%; HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.79-1.42) nor female vs male sex (11.9% vs 9.3%; HR 1.28, 95% CI 0.91-1.81) significantly affected 10-year mortality post-PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: