Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Archaeologists working in non-Western areas of the world tend to employ monothetic, unilinear definitions of ‘urbanization’. The definition of what constitutes a ‘city’ in archaeological terms is also ambiguous. Most definitions are biased by dependence on early archaeological work in the Mediterranean and Southwest Asia. Models of city formation must be based on multi-linear, polythetic criteria, in order to accommodate non-Western phenomena. A polythetic functional definition of urbanization recognizes two distinct forms of the city: orthogenetic and heterogenetic. Literature on Southeast Asia has mainly concerned itself with orthogenetic sites. This article presents archaeological data on under-studied heterogenetic cities in insular Southeast Asia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John N. Miksic (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: