Key result
Triple therapy (HR 2.88, p=0.0004) and single antiplatelet plus anticoagulant (HR 1.66, p=0.009) increased 2-year death, MI, stroke, or major bleeding vs antiplatelet therapy alone after TAVR.
Why the study?
Optimal antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remained unclear.
Cohort (n=241)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant caution with intensified regimens post-TAVR; leaves open optimal strategy for randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: Optimal antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unclear. We evaluated the association between antithrombotic regimens and outcomes in TAVR patients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent TAVR at a single academic center from April 2009 to March 2014. Antithrombotic regimens were classified as single or dual antiplatelet therapy (AP), single antiplatelet plus anticoagulant (SAC), or triple therapy (TT). The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and major bleeding. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were obtained with best subset variable selection methods using bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: Of 246 patients who underwent TAVR, 241 were eligible for analysis with 133, 88, and 20 patients in the AP, SAC, and TT groups, respectively. During a median 2.1-year follow-up, 53.5% had at least one endpoint-the most common was death (68%), followed by major bleeding (23%), stroke (6%), and MI (3%). At 2 years, the composite outcome occurred in 70% of TT, 42% of SAC, and 31% of AP patients. Compared to AP, adjusted HRs for the composite outcome were 2.88 [95% Confidence intervals (CI) (1.61-5.16); p = 0.0004] and 1.66 (95% CI [1.13-2.42]; p = 0.009) in the TT and SAC groups, respectively. Mortality rates at 2 years were 61% in the TT, 32% in the SAC, and 26% in the AP groups (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of the composite outcome of death, MI, stroke, or major bleeding at 2-year follow-up was significantly higher in TAVR patients treated with TT or SAC versus AP, even after multivariate adjustment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Varshney et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (n=241). Triple therapy (DAPT plus oral anticoagulant) or single antiplatelet plus oral anticoagulant (SAC) vs. Single or dual antiplatelet therapy alone (AP) was evaluated on Composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding at 2 years (HR 2.88, 95% CI 1.61-5.16, p=0.0004). Triple therapy (HR 2.88, p=0.0004) and single antiplatelet plus anticoagulant (HR 1.66, p=0.009) increased 2-year death, MI, stroke, or major bleeding vs antiplatelet therapy alone after TAVR.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: