Key result
Combination antithrombotics after valve-in-valve TAVI linked to ~176% higher MACCE risk vs single antiplatelets.
Why the study?
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a less invasive alternative to redo surgery for failed surgical bioprostheses, but optimal antithrombotic management is uncertain.
Does oral anticoagulation or combination therapy improve clinical or echocardiographic outcomes compared to antiplatelet-only strategies in adults undergoing valve-in-valve TAVI?
Cohort (n=1,050)
Yes
Does oral anticoagulation or combination therapy improve clinical or echocardiographic outcomes compared to antiplatelet-only strategies in adults undergoing valve-in-valve TAVI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients undergoing valve-in-valve TAVI, OAC-containing regimens were associated with higher MACCE rates than antiplatelet-only strategies, likely driven by higher baseline comorbidities, with no sustained echocardiographic benefit at 12 months.
Background Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation is a less invasive alternative to redo surgery for failed surgical bioprostheses, but optimal antithrombotic management is uncertain. Objectives To compare outcomes across antithrombotic regimens after valve-in-valve procedures in real-world practice. Methods In the Australasian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (2018–2025), 1,050 adults were grouped by discharge regimen: single antiplatelet therapy, dual antiplatelet therapy, oral anticoagulation, or oral anticoagulation plus antiplatelet therapy. Outcomes included 30-day and 12-month mortality, stroke/TIA, life-threatening or major bleeding, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and echocardiographic valve performance. Results Thirty-day mortality was higher with oral anticoagulation (1.7%) and combination therapy (3.6%) than with single or dual antiplatelet therapy (both 0%; p < 0.001). The 30-day MACCE rate was greater with oral anticoagulation (4.5%) and combination therapy (4.4%) than with single (1.5%) or dual antiplatelet therapy (0.4%) ( p = 0.003); stroke/TIA and bleeding were infrequent and similar across groups. At 12 months, MACCE remained highest with oral anticoagulation (11.8%) and combination therapy (10.7%) compared with single (5.0%) and dual antiplatelet therapy (3.2%) ( p = 0.001). Mortality at 12 months was numerically higher with oral anticoagulation or combination therapy (5.2% and 4.4%) than with single or dual antiplatelet therapy (1.8% and 2.4%) ( p = 0.116). At 30 days, transvalvular gradients were lower in patients receiving oral anticoagulation-containing regimens; however, no significant differences in gradients, valve area, ejection fraction, or regurgitation were observed at 12 months. In multivariable analysis, combination therapy was independently associated with higher odds of 12-month MACCE compared with SAPT (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.03–7.37; p = 0.043). Higher STS score and greater frailty were also independently associated with 12-month MACCE. Conclusions In this observational cohort of patients undergoing valve-in-valve TAVI, oral anticoagulation-containing regimens were associated with higher early mortality and higher 12-month MACCE rates than antiplatelet-only strategies. However, these associations should be interpreted cautiously, as they likely reflect in part the greater baseline comorbidity burden of patients prescribed anticoagulation rather than a direct treatment effect. No sustained haemodynamic benefit was observed at 12 months. Individualised antithrombotic therapy and prospective randomised studies are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dababneh et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valves requiring valve-in-valve TAVI (n=1,050). Combination therapy (oral anticoagulation plus antiplatelet) vs. Single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) was evaluated on 12-month Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.03-7.37, p=0.043). Combination antithrombotic therapy following valve-in-valve TAVI was associated with a significantly higher risk of 12-month MACCE compared to single antiplatelet therapy (OR 2.76), likely reflecting greater baseline comorbidity burden.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: