July 21, 2025Acta Médica PortuguesaOpen Access

Antithrombotic Treatment After Valve-in-Valve, Valve-in-Ring, and Valve-in-MAC Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Anticoagulation showed lower rates of clinical thrombosis after valve-in-valve, valve-in-ring, and valve-in-MAC procedures.
Patients receiving anticoagulants had a clinical VT rate of 1.1%, compared to 8.3% for those on antiplatelets.
Six observational studies were analyzed, including 1,082 participants, focusing on efficacy and safety of antithrombotic strategies.
Current evidence highlights the need for more randomized controlled trials to confirm these findings and assess bleeding risks.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Systematic review identifies potential benefits of anticoagulation in valve-in-valve, valve-in-ring, and valve-in-mitral annular calcification procedures, suggesting an improved risk profile for thrombosis.

Cite This Study

Batista et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0614e6551bb0af8cd485 https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.22905

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Antithrombotic Treatment After Valve-in-Valve, Valve-in-Ring, and Valve-in-MAC Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Antithrombotic Treatment After Valve-in-Valve, Valve-in-Ring, and Valve-in-MAC Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider