Key result
CT simulation predicts high coronary obstruction risk in ~28% of redo TAVI candidates.
Why the study?
Transcatheter heart valves eventually degenerate, and although redo TAVI is an attractive reintervention strategy, it carries a risk of coronary obstruction. This study used CT simulation to predict how many TAVI procedures patients could undergo in their lifetime.
Can cardiac CT simulation predict the risk of coronary obstruction and feasibility of redo TAVI in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=213)
Can cardiac CT simulation predict the risk of coronary obstruction and feasibility of redo TAVI in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis?
Baseline cardiac CT simulation can predict lifetime redo TAVI feasibility and coronary obstruction risk, potentially guiding the initial choice between surgical and transcatheter valve replacement or valve type in younger patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CT simulation stratifies redo TAVI risk; extends modeling data but leaves open any role in guiding initial valve choice.
BACKGROUND: Given enough time, transcatheter heart valves (THVs) will degenerate and may require reintervention. Redo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an attractive strategy but carries a risk of coronary obstruction. AIMS: We sought to predict how many TAVIs patients could undergo in their lifetime using computed tomography (CT) simulation. METHODS: We analysed paired CT scans (baseline and 30 days post-TAVI) from patients in the LRT trial and EPROMPT registry. We implanted virtual THVs on baseline CTs, comparing predicted valve-to-coronary (VTC) distances to 30-day CT VTC distances to evaluate the accuracy of CT simulation. We then simulated implantation of a second virtual THV within the first to estimate the risk of coronary obstruction due to sinus sequestration and the need for leaflet modification. RESULTS: We included 213 patients with evaluable paired CTs. There was good agreement between virtual (baseline) and actual (30 days) CT measurements. CT simulation of TAVI followed by redo TAVI predicted low coronary obstruction risk in 25.4% of patients and high risk, likely necessitating leaflet modification, in 27.7%, regardless of THV type. The remaining 46.9% could undergo redo TAVI so long as the first THV was balloon-expandable but would likely require leaflet modification if the first THV was self-expanding. CONCLUSIONS: Using cardiac CT simulation, it is possible to predict whether a patient can undergo multiple TAVI procedures in their lifetime. Those who cannot may prefer to undergo surgery first. CT simulation could provide a personalised lifetime management strategy for younger patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis and inform decision-making. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT02628899; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03557242; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03423459.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Medranda et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (n=213). Computed tomography simulation of initial and redo TAVI vs. 30-day post-TAVI CT measurements (and balloon-expandable vs self-expanding THV types) was evaluated on Predicted risk of coronary obstruction due to sinus sequestration and need for leaflet modification during redo TAVI. CT simulation of redo TAVI predicted low coronary obstruction risk in 25.4% of patients, high risk in 27.7%, and THV-type-dependent risk in 46.9%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: