Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Limited health literacy, clinical jargon, and time-constrained consultations often impair patients' understanding of medical findings. We evaluated whether AI-generated, quality-checked lay language summaries provided before consultations improve communication-related outcomes. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized trial in an outpatient neurosurgical setting, 300 adults were randomly assigned 1:1 to standard care with or without a quality-checked, AI-generated layperson summary of their medical findings (Simply Onno) before consultation. The primary end point was patient-reported quality of physician-patient interaction (Fragebogen zur Arzt-Patient-Interaktion [FAPI]). Secondary end points included autonomy support (Health Care Climate Questionnaire [HCCQ]), encounter difficulty (Difficult Doctor-Patient Relationship Questionnaire [DDPRQ-10]), and consultation duration (minutes). RESULTS: The mean FAPI score was higher in the intervention group (4.42±0.51 vs. 4.25±0.54; difference, 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05 to 0.29; P=0.005; Hedges' g=0.33), driven by shared decision-making (difference, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.42), with no evidence of a difference in perceived empathy. Patient-rated autonomy support was higher (difference, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.23), whereas physicians rated their own autonomy support slightly lower (difference, -0.12; cluster-robust 95% CI, -0.21 to -0.04). Median consultation time was 25 versus 33 minutes in the intervention group versus the control group, respectively, an approximate 21% relative reduction (ratio of geometric means, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.88). For encounter difficulty (DDPRQ-10), we found potential evidence of a small increase (difference, 0.09; cluster-robust 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.21). Secondary end point confidence intervals were unadjusted for multiplicity. CONCLUSIONS: AI-generated summaries provided before outpatient neurosurgical consultations were associated with better patient-reported interaction quality and autonomy support and shorter consultations. Physicians rated their own autonomy support as slightly lower in the intervention group; evidence for increased encounter difficulty was limited, with confidence intervals compatible with no difference. These findings support further evaluation of quality-checked, patient-facing document translation; effects on clinical outcomes and clinician workload require confirmation before routine adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: