Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exploratory technical report. We separate model behavior into three independent dimensions—artifact delivery, report-artifact relation, and execution-claim veracity—and annotate 35 samples black-box. In these 35 samples: under-delivery 42.9%, report substitution 20.0%, false completion claims 17.1%, concretized descriptions of unexecuted work 17.1%. The preregistered image primary analysis was not executed due to a delivery floor effect; the exploratory text control found no reduction in delivery (+0.4, p=1.00), and the sample is insufficient to establish equivalence. This report does not claim a new failure mechanism, nor a demonstrable increment over existing taxonomies. It provides a reproducible annotation framework, traceable cases, and hypotheses for further testing. Known limits: image content annotation not performed; no systematic literature review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Macily Lei (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: