Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Thin-walled cold-formed steel (CFS) members buckle prematurely under fire because their limited wall thickness heats rapidly, yet lightweight fire-protection options beyond bulky gypsum encasement remain largely unexplored. This gap motivated an experimental and numerical investigation of two thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) – a plasma-sprayed yttria-stabilised zirconia (YSZ) coating and an epoxy-based intumescent coating – applied to S355 lipped CFS channels (150 × 50 × 2 mm), with 10 specimens tested per group (uncoated, YSZ, intumescent) under the ISO-834 standard fire curve. Buckling progression was tracked with LVDT and thermocouple instrumentation, post-fire residual strength was measured through ASTM E8 tensile testing, and the observed behaviour was reproduced with nonlinear ABAQUS finite-element models. Both coatings delayed the onset of substrate buckling and improved post-fire load retention relative to uncoated specimens, with the intumescent coating performing marginally better due to its expanding char layer. A numerically modelled functionally graded material (FGM)-TBC configuration is also proposed as a means to further reduce interfacial thermal stress, though it has not yet been experimentally validated. The results suggest that current Eurocode 3 reduction factors may not capture the benefit of coated sections, though this finding should be treated as preliminary pending broader validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chandrakar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: