Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hip Lock, a coaching construct for single-leg actions, comprises stance-side hip co-contraction for pelvic stabilization and free-side pelvic elevation, but how task strategies influence these components remains unclear. This study examined which combination of foot-contact and upper-limb strategies strengthens both components. Thirty healthy young men performed a single-leg extension task under four conditions combining foot-contact strategy (flat-foot vs. heel-raised contact) and upper-limb strategy (arm restriction vs. free arm use). Three-dimensional kinematics, surface electromyography, and ground reaction force were recorded, and 25 variables were analyzed using two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with false discovery rate correction. Frontal-plane hip co-contraction was higher with flat-foot contact (η2p = 0.31) and extensor–flexor hip co-contraction was higher with free arm use (η2p = 0.31), whereas free-side pelvic elevation was greater with heel-raised contact (η2p = 0.52) and was not reduced by arm use. No interaction remained significant after correction. Pelvic elevation was greatest under heel-raised contact with free arm use (17.4 ± 4.9°). Thus, foot-contact strategy shifted the emphasis between stabilization and elevation, whereas arm use increased co-contraction without compromising elevation. These preliminary findings suggest that heel-raised contact with free arm use may serve as a candidate condition for future Hip Lock training studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: