Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined the relationship between STEM lecturers' motivation, institutional outputs and research innovations in North-Central Nigeria. A correlational survey design was employed. The target population consisted of about 1,840 full-time STEM lecturers in public universities in North-Central Nigeria, from which 368 lecturers were selected using multi-stage sampling technique. Data were collected using the researcher-developed STEM Lecturers' Motivation, Institutional Outputs and Research Innovations Questionnaire (SLMOIRQ). The instrument was validated by experts in Measurement and Evaluation and STEM education and produced a reliability coefficient of 0.82 using Cronbach's Alpha test. Out of 368 distributed questionnaires, 342 were validly returned, giving a 92.9% response rate. Means and standard deviations were used to address the research questions, while Pearson Product-Moment Correlation was used to test the hypotheses at 0.05 significance level. The study found that intrinsic motivation was high (M=3.36, SD=0.64) and was positively related to institutional outputs of good quality (r=0.412, p=0.001). On the contrary, extrinsic motivation was low (M=1.97, SD=0.83) and had weak and insignificant relationship with research innovations (r=0.185, p=0.124). The study concluded that intrinsic motivation is an important correlate of institutional outputs, whereas the current extrinsic motivational conditions are inadequate to significantly stimulate research innovations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
OLUWASEUN et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: