Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Advanced Separation Engineering requires graduate students to connect separation principles with process design and engineering decision-making. Using action research, this study developed and refined a reform based on the Conceive–Design–Implement–Operate (CDIO) framework across four annual offerings from 2022 to 2025. The reform integrated authentic engineering projects, AI-supported learning resources, digital process simulation, collaborative inquiry, and continuous assessment. Course evaluations from the 2021 pre-reform historical cohort (n = 46) were compared with those from the pooled reform cohorts (n = 254), supplemented by open-ended responses and interviews. The reform cohorts reported higher ratings on all five common course-evaluation items, with differences remaining statistically significant after Holm adjustment and Hedges’ g ranging from 1.29 to 2.11. Overall satisfaction averaged 3.41 in the historical cohort and 4.58 in the reform cohorts. On supplementary single-item self-report questions, 91.7% considered the CDIO reform helpful for developing comprehensive engineering competence, and 76.4% reported that AI-supported resources and digital simulation helped them understand complex separation processes. Student feedback identified software learning demands, group coordination, verification of AI outputs, and inconsistent industry-expert participation as continuing challenges. This four-year action research study provides a practice-informed reference for integrating CDIO projects and technological support in graduate engineering courses, based on students’ reported experiences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: