Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This note examines the tension between autonomy and protection in adult social care law and practice. Drawing on the authors’ experiences and the legal frameworks governing care, support and mental capacity, it explores how efforts to promote welfare and manage risk may restrict autonomy and liberty. Particular attention is given to the role of local government lawyers in advising social work professionals on the legality, necessity and proportionality of interventions, and in shaping applications before the Court of Protection and under the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction. It argues that meaningful person-centred practice requires critical reflection of the exercise of power when balancing risk, protection and individual choice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harland et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: