Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Timely pavement-condition information supports network-level maintenance planning, but repeated profiler surveys require dedicated field campaigns. This study develops a scripted workflow that converts openly available Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) observations into segment-level International Roughness Index (IRI) estimates and pavement-management outputs. A seven-configuration experiment separates SAR inputs (S), pre-inspection engineering information (P), and contemporaneous condition indicators (C) according to their availability relative to the target inspection. The study comprises 8,188 flexible-asphalt pavement segments in Alaska, Utah, and West Virginia, including 1,228 corridor-held-out test observations. SAR alone achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 14.8 in/mi. Under retrospective, inspection-aligned evaluation, combining SAR with pre-inspection information reduced MAE to 13.4 in/mi, compared with 16.1 in/mi for pre-inspection information alone. Full fusion achieved an MAE of 12.9 in/mi, an RMSE of 17.2 in/mi, and a squared Pearson correlation of 0.69, indicating only a further 0.5 in/mi improvement over the same-campaign condition indicators. Matched SAR-only AnySat and SkySense adaptations achieved three-seed mean MAEs of 14.2 and 14.5 in/mi, respectively. For the full-fusion predictor, MC dropout and split-conformal intervals achieved 89.6% and 90.2% empirical coverage, respectively, at a nominal 90% level. Uncertainty-guided screening flagged 8.4% of test segments while capturing 35.2% of errors exceeding 25 in/mi. The results support using an availability-aware satellite screening layer to prioritize field measurements within the evaluated domain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tutul et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: