Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Inclusive secondary mathematics education is complex because teachers must respond to learner variability while preserving mathematical goals and participation. Using a mixed-methods design, we examined changes in multidimensional professional learning following participation in a graduate course on teaching students with special educational needs (SEN), focusing on inclusive practices, attitudes, self-efficacy, and achievement emotions. Participants were 29 master’s students in secondary mathematics education. Pre- and post-course measures were complemented by written reflections that illuminated practical and emotional dimensions of learning. Participants reported improvements in inclusive practices, attitudes, and self-efficacy, alongside more favorable achievement emotions: enjoyment, hope, and pride increased, whereas anger, anxiety, and hopelessness decreased. Qualitative findings revealed a shift from viewing adaptations as isolated techniques to diagnostically analyzing learner characteristics, task demands, and instructional design. Participants distinguished more clearly among content-related, cognitive, and executive-function difficulties and translated these distinctions into concrete supports. Findings underscore the value of sustained, differentiated, and reflective preparation for supporting multidimensional professional learning in inclusive mathematics classrooms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tzohar-Rozen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: