Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction Wrist osteoarthritis (OA) is a disabling condition often affecting individuals of working age and frequently resulting from previous trauma. When non-operative management fails, surgical salvage procedures may reduce pain but require structured postoperative rehabilitation. Telerehabilitation has demonstrated comparable outcomes to standard face-to-face rehabilitation in several musculoskeletal conditions; however, evidence following its effectiveness after wrist OA surgery is lacking. This trial aims to evaluate whether a web-based rehabilitation programme is non-inferior to standard, face-to-face rehabilitation following surgical salvage procedures for wrist OA. Methods and analysis This is a prospective, parallel-group, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial conducted at a tertiary hand surgery centre. 90 adults undergoing surgical salvage procedures for wrist OA (four-corner fusion, lunocapitate fusion, scaphotrapeziotrapezoid fusion, radioscapholunate fusion or proximal row carpectomy) will be randomised 1:1 to receive either postoperative web-based rehabilitation or standard face-to-face rehabilitation. The primary outcome is the patient-rated wrist evaluation score measured 12 weeks after immobilisation has ended. Secondary outcomes include pain, health-related quality of life, fear of movement, range of motion, grip strength, patient-reported experience, adherence and cost of rehabilitation. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been granted by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority in November 2024. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications. Trial registration number NCT06814821
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tandrup et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: