Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
What if the oldest question in philosophy—"what is the ultimate ground of reality?"—cannot be answered, yet also cannot be abandoned? This paper traces an unconventional route from the analysis of sexual experience to a transformed conception of first philosophy. Beginning with the claim that sexuality involves not merely biological disposition but a three-dimensional interaction among the individual-organismic, the social-symbolic, and the material-objectual, we develop a relational account of experience as an event constituted through embodied, social, and material relations. Extending this structure to feeling, life-tendency, and resistance, we argue that resistance is not simply an obstacle to desire but a generative condition whose experiential valence depends on relational context. Modeled recursively as Rₙ → Gₙ → Rₙ₊₁, this pattern operates at both individual and social levels: meaning systems stabilize collective life until they collapse, prompting reorganization. Traditional first philosophy dies when its demand for an external, fixed foundation is placed inside the process it seeks to explain. Yet grounding itself persists. First philosophy returns—not as the search for a final foundation outside becoming, but as the inquiry into how reality recursively generates, stabilizes, contests, and revises grounds from within. The death and return of first philosophy thus become a reflexive demonstration of recursive ontology itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gangbei Niu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: