Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single-use plastics (SUPs) remain a major obstacle to a circular plastics economy. Interventions to reduce them have typically pursued either system-level (S-level) measures or individual-level (I-level) behaviour change campaigns, and participatory work has tended to engage consumers or stakeholders at only one of these levels. Building on macromarketing's systems perspective and on macro-social marketing, we develop the Theory-Individual-System-Intervention (TISI) framework, which specifies how marketing can use consumer insight, organised through the COM-B model, to coordinate change across the micro, meso and macro levels of the plastics marketing system. The framework distinguishes consumers’ market role at the I-level (purchase, use, return and refill) from their citizen role at the S-level (acceptance, perceived fairness, willingness to comply and collective support). We validate its four steps empirically with SUP milk packaging in New Zealand, drawing on 20 consumer interviews and a best-worst scaling survey of 400 consumers. Most barriers consumers reported were opportunity constraints rooted in the marketing system, and respondents preferred incentives and regulation to information-only approaches. The study offers macromarketing an operational account of how marketing can sequence consumer-informed action across levels, and offers practitioners a route to SUP reduction that does not place the burden on consumers alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pham et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: