Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hormonal agents and their association with liver injury remain a concern in clinical practice. This study aimed to characterise the biochemical and clinical features of hormonal agent-associated liver injury and compare them with a control group of age- and gender-matched cases of liver injury caused by non-hormonal drugs. METHODS: Of 2123 adjudicated drug-induced liver injury cases enrolled in the Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (2004-2024), 20 high-confidence cases (1.3%) were attributed to hormonal agents. These cases were compared with age- and sex-matched non-hormonal drug-induced liver injury (DILI) controls, and analyses assessed clinical features, biochemical patterns, outcomes, HLA alleles and candidate genetic variants associated with cholestatic liver disease. RESULTS: The median age of women was 22 years. Most presented within 2-12 weeks with jaundice and pruritus, predominantly with cholestatic or mixed patterns of liver enzyme elevations, but a hepatocellular pattern was not uncommon at 28%. The route of administration did not appear to influence DILI risk. Half underwent a liver biopsy, and half required hospitalization, but none died or required liver transplantation. Compared with other DILI cases, hormonal agent-associated liver injury was more often cholestatic, with jaundice and pruritus, and less frequently associated with fever or rash. No HLA association was identified, although the intronic MROH2A variant rs6722064 ranked as the top potential candidate for increased risk [OR (95% CI) = 3.58 (1.67, 7.65), p = 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Hormonal agent-associated liver injury presents with a distinctive mixed or cholestatic pattern and often lacks the inflammatory features seen in other DILI cases. These findings underscore the need for greater clinical awareness to improve patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vuppalanchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: