Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: This study seeks to evaluate the safety and efficacy of magnesium (MgSO4) as a protective agent against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN) in cases with head and neck cancers (HNC). METHODS: One-hundred newly diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma HNC were randomly allocated into 4 groups: 25 cases in each. Group 1 (control group) received cisplatin 40 mg/m2 for 7 cycles (each cycle is 1 week). Group 2 received cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and 1 g of parenteral MgSO4 intravenous infusion (IVI) for 7 cycles. Group 3 received cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and 2 g of parenteral MgSO4 IVI for 7 cycles. Group 4 received cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and 3 g of parenteral MgSO4 for 7 cycles. All four groups received radiotherapy concurrent with cisplatin for 7 cycles. RESULTS: The groups containing Mg IVI as (MgSO4) had a significant improvement (lower level) in Urine kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and Urine Neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL) than Group I (control group) (P < 0.05). Serum soluble Fas ligand (sFasL) and Malondialdehyde (MDA) after the end cycle (7 cycle) was significantly decreased in Group IV than group I (control group) (P < 0.05), MgSo4 was significantly decreased in Group IV (3 g Mg) than Group III (2 g Mg) (P < 0.001) and Group II (1 g Mg). CONCLUSIONS: Mg can serve as a protective agent against CIN, as it reduces renal injury biomarkers, including urinary KIM-1, urinary NGAL, serum sFasL, and serum MDA when incorporated into treatment regimens at different doses, compared to cisplatin alone. Moreover, Mg had a promising role in the improvement of quality of life in cases with HNC receiving cisplatin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Younis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: